Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  178 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 178 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

S170

Symposia / European Geriatric Medicine 6S1 (2015) S157

S176

England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands) and

1 non EU country (Israel). Mean age of 4156 residents entering

the study was 83.4

±

9.4 years, 73% were female. ADL disability and

cognitive impairment was observed in 81.3% and 68.0% of residents,

respectively. Clinical complexity of residents was confirmed by

a high prevalence of behavioral symptoms (27.5% of residents),

falls (18.6%), pressure ulcers (10.4%), pain (36.0%) and urinary

incontinence (73.5%). Overall, 197 of the 198 the items tested met or

exceeded standard cut-offs for acceptable test-retest and inter-rater

reliability after translation into the target languages. The SHELTER

study, by the implementation of the InterRAI LTCF led to the

creation of a database that was used to assess characteristics, risk

factors and outcomes of NH residents in Europe. Such a dataset can

be used to govern the provision of long-term care across different

health systems in Europe, to answer relevant research and policy

questions and to compare characteristics of NH residents across

countries, languages and cultures.

3. Presenter: Prof. JE Morley

(Director of Divisions of Geriatrics

and Endocrinology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St.

Louis, USA;

morley@slu.edu

). Title: The IAGG – initiative to increase

quality of care and research in nursing homes around the world.

Despite the increase of the number of institutionalized older people,

clinical research in nursing homes is still scarce. The improvement

of the quality of care in nursing homes, however, depends on future

evidence from scientific studies performed in these settings, their

feasibility in real life conditions and the successful dissemination

of these new clinical evidences. In the presentation the IAGG-GARN

initiative in this field will be reviewed. The current state of research

in long term care will be presented and the needs, highlighted by

an IAGG consensus group and based on evidence based gaps in the

literature, will be addressed. Attention will be paid to the need for

more randomized trials and the need to test new drugs on nursing

home residents before they come on the market. The same counts

for the use of meaningful activities in nursing homes. The use of

MDS 3.0 as a research tool will be discussed. Finally, the definition

of a nursing home and the types of nursing home seen around the

world will be explored.

4. Presenter: Prof Desmond O’Neill

(Prof of Medical Gerontology,

Trinity College Dublin, Ireland;

doneill@tcd.ie

). Title: The interface

of geriatric medical services with nursing homes in Europe

In most countries in Europe, medical care is provided by visiting

general practitioners.

This presentation will review aspects of the interface between

hospital and geriatric medical services, explore the efficiency of in-

reach/out-reach programmes in the existing literature and consider

the training and infrastructural needs in terms of training and

structure of geriatric medicine in Europe.

5. Presenter: Yves Rolland

, MD, PhD (Professor of Geriatrics,

Department of Geriatric Medicine, INSERM 1027 / Gerontopˆole

of Toulouse, France;

rolland.y@chu-toulouse.fr)

. Title: Improving

the quality of care in nursing homes: results from the IQUARE

controlled trial

Authors: Yves Rolland, PhD, Celine Mathieu, MS, Christine Piau,

MD, Fran ¸coise Cayla, MD, Catherine Bouget, MD, Bruno Vellas, PhD,

Philipe de Souto Barreto, PhD.

Background and Objectives:

To examine the effects of a global

intervention of professional support and education to the nursing

home (NH) staff on (1) quality indicators, and (2) residents’

functional decline and emergency department visits.

Design:

Two arms, non-randomized multi-centric individually

tailored controlled trial, with 18-month follow-up. Setting. NHs

in France.

Participants:

175 volunteer NHs and 6,275 residents randomly

selected within each NH. Interventions. NHs were allocated to

either a quality audit and feedback intervention (control group;

n = 90 NHs, 3,258 residents) or to the quality audit and feedback

intervention plus collaborative work meetings between the hospital

geriatrician and NH staff (experimental group; n = 85 NHs, 3,017

residents).

Measurements:

At the nursing home level: Prevalence of assessment

for the kidney function, cognition, risk of pressure ulcers, behavioral

disturbances, depression, pain, weight, and prevalence of transition

to the emergency department. At the resident level: Ability to

perform basic activities of daily living.

Results:

At baseline, NH quality indicators were generally low (with

large standard deviations) and annual rate of transition to the

emergency department was high (about 20%) and similar in both

groups. The intervention had a significant positive effect on the

prevalence of assessment of pressure ulcer risk, depression, pain,

and the prevalence emergency department visits. The intervention

had no significant effect on functional decline.

Conclusion:

Operational and human relationship between hospital

geriatricians and NH leadership staff based on the audit and

collaborative discussion about quality indicators improved some

aspects of the quality of care in NHs.

Trial registration: NCT01703689

S-14

How to get published?

J.-P. Michel

EUGMS, Geneve, Switzerland

My recent role as editor in chief of the EUGMS journal, European

Geriatric Medicine, gave me the opportunity of better identifying

the tricks to get published. The structure of any research papers is

well known, mainly composed by 3 major parts:

– the title attracts the readers’ attention. The authors list includes

no ghost participants in the work. The abstract advertises the

paper and strongly influences whether or not your work is

considered. The key words make it easy for indexing and

searching

– The main text is not unlimited. The introduction has to address

the problem. The methods have to say how you address it. The

results have to be clear and understandable.

– To last the conclusion justifies the importance of your work and

indicates its practical implications. Before ending don’t forget

the acknowledgements and the ethics committee approval. Your

references have to be in accordance with the authors’ guide of

the journal you selected to send your paper.

Writing your scientific paper is easier, more logical and more

effective if you start by preparing figures and tables, then methods,

results and discussion, before establishing the conclusion and

finishing with introduction and title and abstract.

Before launching your manuscript, be sure that it is ready, verify

its format and considering your results, be sure you targeted the

appropriate journal and followed carefully the authors’ guide.

S-16

Joint symposium EUGMS SIG Falls Prevention and

Fracture/ProFouND/EIP on AHA/EUNAAPA

H. Blain

Centre Hospitalier R´egional Universitaire de Motpellier, Montpellier,

France

Chairs:

Hubert Blain, Chris Todd and Ellen Freiberger

Overview:

Lecture 1: What is The Best Strategy to Prevent Hip Fracture?

The EUGMS Viewpoint (Hubert Blain, Tahir Masud, Chris Todd,

Patricia Dargent-Mollina, on behalf EUGMS)

Lecture 2: A ProFouND Update: The European Network to Prevent

Falls (Chris Todd)

Lecture 3: Using Technology to Predict, Detect, Assess and Prevent

Falls (Jochen Klenk)