Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  170 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 170 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

S162

Symposia / European Geriatric Medicine 6S1 (2015) S157

S176

the clinical assessment of cognitive impairment. Introduction of

the novel imaging techniques, MRI and PET and CSF biomarker

have enriched the visualisation of neuropathological features in

living individuals who have a higher risk to develop dementia.

Moreover, identification of the cognitive impaired but not demented

patients has ultimately led to identify early Alzheimer patients

to be included in the trials. In parallel with improvement of

the clinical assessment, genetic research has shed more light in

understanding not only the classical mutations but rather diverse

genetic polymorphisms and gene-gene interactions. Ultimately,

the novel experimental disease-modifying-drugs and therapeutic

substances have shown a promising effect to ameliorate the

accumulation of amyloid protein in the brain. This symposium

will stress the latest “breaking the ice” developments in clinical

and experimental dementia research.

CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

update on established

biomarkers and new developments

(Kaj Blennow, MD, PhD,

Professor, Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Dept. of Neuro-

science and Physiology, Gothenburg University, M¨olndal Campus,

M¨olndal, Sweden): Research advances in Alzheimer’s disease

(AD) molecular pathogenesis have given several drug candidates

targeting

b

-amyloid (A

b

) and recently also tau pathology that are

tested in clinical trials. However, the list of anti-A

b

trials failing

to show clinical benefits indicate that trials need enrol patients

before neurodegeneration is too advanced, to give drug candidates

a chance to show clinical efficacy, and to enrich for patients that

do have AD pathology. To manage this, biomarkers will have a

critical role.

The CSF biomarkers total tau (T-tau), phospho-tau (P-tau) and A

b

(A

b

42 or A

b

42/40 ratio) have consistently been found to have high

diagnostic accuracy to identify AD already in the early (prodromal)

disease stage. Given that CSF A

b

42 show identical diagnostic

performance for AD as amyloid PET at only a fraction of the cost,

it is likely that CSF biomarkers will be important tools for AD

diagnostics.

However, standardization is needed since current ELISA methods

have high between-lab and between-batch variability. The IFCC-

WG for CSF proteins aims to develop a Certified Reference

Material (CRM) for distribution to assay vendors and laboratories to

harmonize assay readouts. A mass spectrometry-based Reference

Measurement Procedure (RMP) has been developed for A

b

42.

Biotech companies are developing high-quality fully automated

assays with minimal analytical variability. Taken together, these

efforts will allow uniform cut-off levels and enable the large-scale

introduction of CSF biomarkers in diagnostic routine.

New developments include assays to monitor soluble A

b

oligomers

and synaptic dysfunction. Recent studies show a marked increase

in CSF levels of both the presynaptic protein SNAP-25 and the

dendritic protein neurogranin in AD dementia and prodromal AD,

with higher neurogranin levels predicting a more rapid cognitive

decline and with progression to AD dementia. This type of synaptic

biomarkers may be valuable to select early AD cases for inclusion

in trials, and to monitor drug effects on synaptic function and

integrity.

Dementia genetics

current status and future potential

(Ole

A. Andreassen MD PhD, Professor, NORMENT KG Jebsen Centre,

University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway): The

heritability of late onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is fairly high, but

most of the genetic risk is unknown. ApoE was for a long time the

only identified risk gene, but recent technological developments

have revolutionized this type of research. Now it is possible to

genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of hundred thousand

participants, and the largest study to date identified 19 single

nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) tagging risk loci.

Epidemiological findings suggest a relationship between (AD), and

other neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as inflammation and

dyslipidemia. However, the nature of these relationships is not well

understood. We investigated whether these phenotypic associations

arise from a shared genetic basis (‘pleiotropy’). We investigate

overlap in (SNPs) associated with clinically diagnosed AD and

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and between AD and C-reactive protein

(CRP), triglycerides (TG), high (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein

(LDL) levels.

We demonstrate polygenic overlap between AD, inflammation, and

plasma lipids and identify three novel genome-wide significant

variants conferring increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Our

findings identify the tau-associated MAPT locus as a site of genetic

overlap between AD and PD, and support the hypothesis that

inflammatory mechanisms and dyslipidaemia influence Alzheimer’s

pathogenesis.

Studies of rare gene variants have recently revealed gene variants

with protective properties (in APP) which may lead to development

of new drug targets. We also recently found risk variants in TREM2

and ABCA7, which suggest an involvement in immune mechanisms

and membrane transport in AD pathology.

The recent findings in the molecular genetics mechanisms

of dementia have provided new knowledge about disease

pathogenesis, as well as new opportunities for development of

new treatment regimens.

The role of imaging in dementia: Methods for research and

clinical practice

(Lars-Olof Wahlund, Professor, Section for Clinical

Geriatrics, NVS department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm,

Sweden;

lars-olof.wahlund@ki.se

): Neuroimaging has become

increasingly important in the clinical assessment of dementia as

well as in clinical research. Today we use imaging biomarkers for

several of dementia disorders. With MRI and CT the structural

changes in dementia can be assess with high precision. The specific

changes seen in for instance Alzheimer’s disease are easily detected

early in the disease process using MRI or CT. This knowledge has

been implemented in the new suggested criteria for Alzheimer’s

diseases publish by Dubois et al some years ago. Last years it

has become possible to study the key pathological processes in the

brain of Alzheimer’s disease by assessing amyloid in the brain using

PET technique. This fact and the fact that glucose metabolism can

be studied in several dementia disorders has made it possible to

use these techniques for biomarkers in disease modifying clinical

trials. The talk will include a review of the most modern methods

used in dementia workup as well as in dementia research for

both diagnostic purposes and as biomarker for effect evaluation in

clinical trials on disease modifying drugs.

Novel and experimental therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease

(Nenad Bogdanovic MD, PhD, Professor, Geriatric Department,

Memory Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, UiO, Oslo, Norway):

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is presently incurable and treatable only

in terms of modest delay of symptomatic progression. The unmet

need for more effective pharmacological intervention is becoming

mandatory as the patient population increases. Only symptomatic

drug therapies have been approved for treating AD; cholinesterase

inhibitors (ChEIs), and memantine, an NMDA receptor agonist, or

donepezil, a ChEI. The lack of novel treatment options beyond

ChEIs and memantine is due to insufficiently understanding of

Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology.

Last 20 years, the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (John Hardy 1992)

is providing the neurobiological rationale in the development

of the new drugs against AD, suggesting that decreasing beta-

amyloid protein load in patients could have an ameliorating effect.

Unfortunately failure of several amyloid clearance therapies within

the last 3–4 years has dramatically broadened the landscape of

pathways that are under investigation. Moreover, it has been shown

that making a diagnose of AD based on the presence of the beta-

amyloid in the brain is not an easy task without employment of

biomarkers and the failure of some very promising compounds